Deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent

deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent Merely because the appellant was called through a summons issued under law, the conduct of beating and torturing the appellant on the latter appearing in obedience to the summons cannot establish any nexus between the official act of issuance of summons and the action of the respondent on the appearance of the appellant.

Of respondent no01 on record] vs smtmanju kannoje state of chhattisgarh & ors yogesh chandra ,uttam pandey / ag [ on admission and ia 01 application. However, barely three months later, the respondent husband filed a regular petition for divorce at ghaziabad inter alia alleging adultery against his wife the appellant-wife refuted the charge the court granted her maintenance pendente lite at rs 1,000 pm. Uttam chand vs smt kavita on 6 september, 2018 posted on 09/06/2018 by mynation leave a comment the respondent sued appellant for divorce alleging.

deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent Merely because the appellant was called through a summons issued under law, the conduct of beating and torturing the appellant on the latter appearing in obedience to the summons cannot establish any nexus between the official act of issuance of summons and the action of the respondent on the appearance of the appellant.

Firstly, the appellant-accused was in sector 37, noida in the state of uttar pradesh on 1522007 he was at noida before 755 pm he, thereafter, remained at different places within noida and then at shakarpur, ghaziabad, patparganj, jorbagh, etc. Notice learned counsel for the parties may please parties name appellant respondent 31 2671/2016 uprstc vs smt savita uttam and others (district kanpur. Keeping the above statutory provisions in mind when we examine the allegations levelled against the respondent by the appellant it transpires that according to the appellant based on a complaint preferred by smt maya rani alleging that the appellant and one rc chopra were living in an illicit relationship, the respondent directed the. Appellant nawab singh on the basis of the above-referred complaint of sangeeta uttam and the case was handed over to anti corruption branch of delhi for investigation.

The enforcement directorate alleged that the appellant had contravened the provisions of section 8(2) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 and accordingly rendered himself liable to imposition of penalty under section 50 of the act. The fair market value of the property as on 01041981 by the registered valuer on the basis of prevailing market rate from the relevant records of sub-registry office as well as inquiry made from local market cannot be said that the valuation done without any basis. Print list of defective cases ( 13/04/2016 ) defects must be removed within 7 working days sno token no party details petitioner advocate respondent advocate.

This court in shivaji dayanu patil and another v smt vatschala uttam more1 was dealing with conceptual meaning of the phrase arising out of the use of motor vehicle as contained in section 92a of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1939 act'. By the impugned order, the ld district forum allowed the complaint lodged by the respondent sri uttam das @ uttam kumar das under section 12 of the act on contest in part with a direction upon the opposite party to recast and send the bill against actual consumption of electricity on average basis to the complainant within one month from the. Plaintiff/respondent in the sum of rs1,00,000/- (instead of rs2,00,000/- as prayed) along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Relying on rajendra kumar sitaram pande & ors vs uttam & anr3, learned counsel argued that under the given circumstances, requiring the appellants to undergo trial would be travesty of justice 10per contra, shri kk venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no2 supported the impugned judgment and submitted that.

Mention herein that on death of the original appellant smt shyamala roy, the name of pro-forma respondent no7 as her legal heir was substituted as the appellant. Consumer court activities, calcutta, india 2,406 likes 3 talking about this this page being introduced to update consumer, consumer law, judgments. Deokabai (smt) vs uttam the respondent filed a suit on 1752011 seeking specific performance of an agreement dated 3042002 ('the agreement') concerning sale. Eviction petition filed by the appellant against the tenant-respondent no2 boddu venkatakrishna rao and others vs smt (1985) 2 scc 683 and uttam vs. Page 3 of 5 mac appeal- 1(k) of 2010 5] after completion of trial, the learned trial court arrived at the finding that there was negligence on the part of the driver of the vehicle for which it was run by helper/handyman.

Deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent

Appellate tribunal date of hearing august 31, 2017 bench -ii time 1100 am safema/ndps item appeal no appellant name respondent ramesh chand alias meshu . Prima facie evidence being shown by the respondent to justify her claim, rest being a matter of evidence, the petition is dismissed imposing costs in sum of `11,000/- upon the petitioner which he shall pay to the respondent. It is also the admitted case of the respondent in her complaint filed before the ld mm that in the last 10 ­12 years, whenever she used to contact the respondent/appellant herein, or otherwise confronted him in order to revive the relation and reconcile the marriage, the respondent/appellant herein had never made any attempt to visit her or. Lawyers are not permitted to solicit work and advertise as per the rules framed by the bar council of india by clicking on the i agree below, you acknowledge the following.

  • Mr justice ejaz afzal khan in his judgment has decided the issue regarding mortgage deed and stamp duty for amount secured under article 15 of stamp act 1899 in civil appeals no 613 and 614 of 2014.
  • What the respondent claims is an exception that in view of a certain term in the indenture of lease, to writ, clause 2, the appellant is not entitled to demand and collect royalty from the respondent.
  • 8 wp227/317/2013 vijay kumar kaushik vs commissioner & ors smt meera ansari,afjal shoeb ansari,resham lal bajpayee,badruddin khan,devesh kela / [ on default of:- 1.

Iii the deed of conveyance dated 1032005, confirmed in 2008, entered into between [1) late mangobinda shaw, 2) smt brinda rani shaw (respondent no 6), 3) shri badal shaw (respondent no7), 4) shri binoy shaw (respondent no8), 5) smt sonali shaw 2 (respondent no9), 6) smt phalguni kabi (respondent no10) on the one part as, as. The respondent filed an application under order xii rule 6 of the code of civil procedure for passing a decree in her favour on the ground that a suit for partition, which had earlier been filed by the appellant on the same ground ie that the suit property was a huf property, had been dismissed by the district court vide judgment dated 89. It has been further stated that the respondent no1 being the owner of the offending vehicle, the respondent no2 being the driver and the respondent no3 being the insurer of the offending vehicle are jointly liable to pay the compensation to the petitioner.

deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent Merely because the appellant was called through a summons issued under law, the conduct of beating and torturing the appellant on the latter appearing in obedience to the summons cannot establish any nexus between the official act of issuance of summons and the action of the respondent on the appearance of the appellant. deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent Merely because the appellant was called through a summons issued under law, the conduct of beating and torturing the appellant on the latter appearing in obedience to the summons cannot establish any nexus between the official act of issuance of summons and the action of the respondent on the appearance of the appellant. deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent Merely because the appellant was called through a summons issued under law, the conduct of beating and torturing the appellant on the latter appearing in obedience to the summons cannot establish any nexus between the official act of issuance of summons and the action of the respondent on the appearance of the appellant. deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent Merely because the appellant was called through a summons issued under law, the conduct of beating and torturing the appellant on the latter appearing in obedience to the summons cannot establish any nexus between the official act of issuance of summons and the action of the respondent on the appearance of the appellant.
Deokabai smt appellant vs uttam respondent
Rated 3/5 based on 12 review

2018.